Talk:Smart Cities Mission
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Smart Cities Mission article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 28 October 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved as unopposed. I guess the proposed title is a proper noun, so there shouldn't be a problem with capitalising it. Jenks24 (talk) 01:37, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Smart Cities in India → Smart Cities Mission – The article is about the scheme of Government and the cities are a mere part of that Scheme -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 06:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. sst✈discuss 09:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Noting that Bishonen moved this while it was listed at RM. Generally we will close as move any discussions that don't get a response, but I'll leave this open for a little longer in case Bishonen wants to make a comment. Jenks24 (talk) 12:11, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Don't mind me, I just moved it to the correct capitalization. I wasn't aware of the RM, and I don't have any opinion on it. Bishonen | talk 13:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Smart Cities Challenge section
editThe entire section is written like a political advertisement for the government. The style appears highly biased, and the prose is incompatible with encyclopedic standards. Statements like "people used to ask where is the development" and "That is why this Mission is refreshingly different" make it appear that the user who introduced the information is pushing POV by using weasel wording. Willard84 (talk) 01:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Overly vague description of projects under this initiative
editThe article uses vague language to describe what the Smart Cities Mission actually entails, other than to generally improve standards of living. Are there any specifics to the project? Specific upgrades in transport, communications, sanitation etc? There's a lot of information about the background, but not much information as to what exactly is to be done as part of the initiative. I understand each city will implement the project differently, but there are only 3 concrete examples of specific projects in participating cities. Many participating cities have a paragraph mentioning their selection prominently in the leads of their wiki pages (see Jalandhar, Bhopal, Dharamsala, New Delhi, etc) , so surely a better list can be created with each individual specific project. Willard84 (talk) 02:00, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Formatting problem
editThere seems to be a formatting problem in the page, towards the end, that I am unable to correct Nagarpedian (talk) 05:36, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
100000000000 Cities
editThat seems wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.22.132.194 (talk) 06:46, 12 February 2022 (UTC)