Talk:Smithtown Christian School

Fair use rationale for Image:Scslogo.jpg

Image:Scslogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:35, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Content Discussion

In hopes this will help editors of this page, there's some content from an older version of the article that may be able to be added back in once verifiable sources are added. Just noting here so it's not just buried in the article history. ~EdGl! 16:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

EdGl, there are no sources on that pile of promotional junk. Do you have any concrete suggestions for content with reliable secondary sources to support it, or are you just bound and determined to waste other editors time? John from Idegon (talk) 16:53, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

My suggestion is to find reliable sources for the content. I can't get to it right now; give it time. Editors who think it's a waste of time won't waste their time on it. ~EdGl! 18:21, 17 September 2020 (UTC)