Talk:Snøhetta (company)

Untitled

Move from Snøhetta to Snøhetta (company) is discussed at Talk:Snøhetta (mountain). --Berland 18:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

This article has been renamed from Snøhetta to Snøhetta (company) as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 07:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo snohetta.gif

Image:Logo snohetta.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Snøhetta (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110518161659/http://www.5710.org.uk/members/archive/archive.php to http://www.5710.org.uk/members/archive/archive.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100723184215/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fc%2Fa%2F2010%2F07%2F21%2FBA401EHV9I.DTL&tsp=1 to http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fc%2Fa%2F2010%2F07%2F21%2FBA401EHV9I.DTL&tsp=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Volunteering

I would like to offer to help this company return to compliance with English Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I have recent experience assisting corporate COI editors and am happy to help. EllenCT (talk) 18:16, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

After 10 days without a response from the company, and having researched the founders' public statements, and having seen more of what appears largely to be a push-poll for the manufacture of false consensus, I regretfully withdraw my offer and recommend that the company remain blocked. EllenCT (talk) 17:03, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:BrandingWikipedia.org

BrandingWikipedia.org is likely to become a notable website if it isn't already. I have started Draft:BrandingWikipedia.org with an outline on its talk page. EllenCT (talk) 06:11, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

I no longer wish to be involved with this effort. EllenCT (talk) 17:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Advertising article

This article is corporate spam and puffery.

Is there any cites for the extended history brochure? If not, it should be removed - David Gerard (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Give it a week. If nothing significant has been done by then, delete all unsourced claims. Some of the sources may be a bit involved and possibly biased too. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 10:08, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

They wrote large chunks of it themselves. These are the people we're apparently supposed to trust with rebranding Wikimedia, too - David Gerard (talk) 13:18, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Product announcements

@Sionk:, Per WP:NEWS, announcements about upcoming products, projects aren't exactly appropriate. Why do you feel the announcement of an upcoming library that Snohetta designed, and any and all media verifiable routine project annoucements would be appropriate? The currently cited source you added back in contains plenty of Snohetta quotations. If you see https://newatlas.com/architecture/westchester-square-library-snohetta/ you'll see it's not even built yet. Annoucements of what architectural companies are up to are routine announcement for architectural magazines. Graywalls (talk) 00:07, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

If someone was simply pasting lists of works from the company website I'd have a problem. But the new library seems to have been reported in a number of sources, including Timeout New York (which isn't an architectural website). It seems to me to be something more than your run-of-the-mill construction project. Sionk (talk) 17:06, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

You can expect there to be a media coverage whenever there's something of significance is built in a place, for example, court house, Walmart location, a university hall just to name a few things. So, simply because a construction company or an architectural firm worked on it, I think listing those things out would be undue. Graywalls (talk) 02:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

That is what architects and architectural practises do, design and create buildings. Of course 'significant' projects are relevant to an article about an architectural practice that has designed them. Pubic libraries are high profile projects which attract public interest. On the other hand there are plenty of things an architectural firm does that are run-of-the-mill, which we wouldn't want listing. Sionk (talk) 23:32, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Edit request 22-SEP-2023

• What I think should be changed: Add Grounds of Blanton Museum of Art, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas to notable projects
• Why it should be changed: Revitalization of grounds at two of the principal architects' alum institution.
• References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): https://www.archpaper.com/2023/05/snohetta-shading-canopy-opens-revitalized-blanton-museum-art-grounds/

Lauren237 (talk) 14:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

References

Reply 22-SEP-2023

  Edit request implemented  

• Additional changes made: the listing for the Westchester Square Library in The Bronx was deleted, as it contained information pertaining to the future, per WP:CRYSTALBALL.

Regards,  Spintendo  18:39, 22 September 2023 (UTC)