Talk:Snood (headgear)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Photo
editAnybody have a common-domain photo of a snood? Also, I think there is a difference in style between the snoods worn by Hasidic women today, and the snoods worn in the 19th century... Anybody got more info?
Rationing?
edit"Snoods became popular again in Europe during World War II. At that time, the British government had placed strict rations on the amount of material that could be used in clothing. While headgear was not rationed, snoods were favored, along with turbans and headscarves, in order to show one's commitment to the war effort."
This is not logical. Commitment to the war effort would be NOT making excessive use of material. Even if its not rationed, it is not going to help the war effort if you wear headwear that uses a lot of material. Could someone clarify or remove?
Hypnoticmonkey (talk) 14:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Er, it's pretty obvious. A snood uses less material than a hat. -- Zsero (talk) 20:48, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Not obvious to me and I'd say even debatable. Maybe put this in the article and give some sort of citation proving it uses less material? Hypnoticmonkey (talk) 10:07, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Less by weight if not always less by yardage. Plus the idea was that reused old material would be employed. Johnbod (talk) 12:04, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Neckwear
editI don't know of a freebie image to use, so i'll use this to demonstrate what I mean: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/12/1/1291203783455/Carlos-Tevez-and-Robert-H-006.jpg
- The neckpiece Carlos Tevez is wearing, would this warant a new article under Headwear, or a new one under Neckwear? Either way, I would think it needs a mention. Narcosis17 (talk) 17:15, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Move
editI propose this article is renamed to Snood (clothing) since it can be neckwear, not necessarily headgear. Ben Finn (talk) 16:39, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
No, a snood is used on the head to confine the hair. See the OED: "A fillet, band, or ribbon, for confining the hair; latterly, in Scotland (and the north of England), the distinctive hair-band worn by young unmarried women. More recently, a fashionable bag-like or closed woman's hairnet, usu. worn at the back of the head.".
Something worn around the neck for warmth is a scarf or comforter. The tubular buff is multipurpose and so can be worn in various ways. The polar models are made with fleece section and I suppose that is what the footballers have been wearing. The commentator's usage of snood for this is a neologism which is being used for humour and so we should avoid it.
1980's
editThere is no mention of their popularity amongst men and women in the 1980's. I remember seeing plenty of snoods on Top of the Pops. If anyone could find a nice reference in 'Smash Hits' it would help the modern interpretation of the word. Kayakboy (talk) 22:14, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Snood (headgear). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.theguardian.com/football/2011/mar/05/snoods-banned-fifa-goalline-technology
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130717220155/http://www.othmanhack.com/drupal/node/9/.html to http://www.othmanhack.com/drupal/node/9/.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:46, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Snood (headgear). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120321040416/http://www.protecdirect.co.uk/Product.asp?I=2044 to http://www.protecdirect.co.uk/Product.asp?I=2044
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:59, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Neck tube use now dominant
editThis clothing item is getting more common - but as the neckwear tube that can be pulled up over the mouth and nose, eg by cyclists, footballers. The old hairnet definition (eg. still in OED) is historic. A Google images search shows clearly. Usage of the word has doubled from 2010 to 2020 (ref Ngram). So the article needs to reflect that, and I support a name change to snood (clothing). 112.119.116.84 (talk) 07:06, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Second about neck tubes in soccer
editI removed the following, as it is not about the headgear
Association football
editAlthough popular for many years with European footballers like Gianluigi Buffon—in the 2010–11 Premier League season, a number of high-profile players, including Carlos Tevez and Samir Nasri, wore snoods. The fashion was derided by commentators as not manly.[citation needed]
Whereas former Manchester United manager Alex Ferguson said he would no longer allow his players to wear snoods,[1] Arsenal manager Arsène Wenger defended their use, suggesting they serve a medical purpose when players have neck problems in the cold weather.[2]
The International Football Association Board feels that snood scarves may pose a risk to a player's neck if jerked from behind.[3] Players in the UK have been banned from wearing them during matches since 1 July 2011. IFAB had a meeting where the issue was brought up, and they were immediately and completely banned on 5 March 2011, due to not being part of the kit.[4]
Zeimusu | Talk page 13:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC) Zeimusu | Talk page 13:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Footballers who wear snoods get it in the neck from Sir Alex Ferguson". Evening Standard. 10 December 2010. Retrieved 5 January 2020.
- ^ "Wenger - Snoods are a medical aid for us". Arsenal F.C. 2010-12-10. Archived from the original on 2011-10-28. Retrieved 2011-09-23.
- ^ "Snoods may be banned in football". BBC Sport. 2011-02-04. Retrieved 2011-09-23.
- ^ Agencies (2011-03-05). "Snoods banned but Fifa to continue goalline technology testing". London: Guardian. Archived from the original on 2013-12-25. Retrieved 2011-09-23.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)