Talk:Snoqualmie Indian Tribe

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

Move?

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Snoqualmie (tribe) → Snoqualmie —

The tribe is the primary subject; all other places and entities with this name that have WP articles are named after the tribe. I have just moved the dab from Snoqualmie to Snoqualmie (disambiguation) —KuyaBriBri^Talk 18:42, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Oppose Stats for Snoqualmie, Washington 2379 views, Snoqualmie (tribe) 375 views, the tribe can't be regarded as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Tassedethe (talk) 18:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Oppose per Tassedethe; primary topics are not established by which came first, but by, among other things, which article people are most searching for. Parsecboy (talk) 16:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Vandalism

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I just removed this phrase from the law enforcement section: "In 2009, there was a series of cougar attacks in the Snoqualmie area which made national headlines and prompted the Snoqualmie Tribe Police Services to ban admission to all women over the age of 45." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.107.0.74 (talk) 17:08, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Outdated Section - Law Enforcement

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. I don't have the time atm to update the page, but the Law Enforcement section is very outdated. Snoqualmie Casino has several tribal police officers, as well as community safety officers. I do no have citable sources for that at the moment, but the obsolete information should at least be deleted, or a note that it's outdated made.

On a related subject, is it a normal part of a tribal Wikipedia article to discuss something like law enforcement? It seems very nitch and not very important nor notable. But I'm unsure if this is standard procedure, so I'm leaving the section for now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.245.150.241 (talk) 04:20, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic