Talk:SoHo Weekly News

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Ktkvtsh in topic GA Review

Possible sources

edit

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:SoHo Weekly News/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ktkvtsh (talk · contribs) 07:59, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


I will be reviewing this article for GA standing. Ktkvtsh (talk) 07:59, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass:   The article on the SoHo Weekly News meets all the criteria for a good article. It provides a comprehensive history of the newspaper, its founders, and its impact on New York's alternative journalism scene. The article is well-sourced, neutral in tone, and offers valuable insights into the publication's significance, making it a strong candidate for recognition as a good article.

  ·   ·   ·