Talk:So Seductive

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Rp0211 in topic GA Review
Good articleSo Seductive has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 22, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:So Seductive/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 05:18, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  


Infobox

edit
  • No issues

Lead

edit

Background

edit

Writing and composition

edit

Critical reception

edit
  • No issues

Music video

edit
  • No issues

Live performances

edit
  • No issues

Awards and nominations

edit

Track listing

edit
  • No issues

Credits and personnel

edit
  • No issues

Charts

edit
  • No issues

Radio and release history

edit
  • No issues

References

edit
  • No issues


After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. There are some minor prose issues among others that are keeping this article from reaching good article status. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not concern good article status, until a consensus is reached. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 06:14, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Since all of the issues have been addressed, I feel comfortable passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 17:45, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply