Talk:So You Think You Can Dance (American TV series) season 9

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles

WikiProject Dance To-do list:

To nominate at WP:FAC:
To improve to Featured standard:
To nominate as a Good article:
To expand: 18th century dance - 20th century ballet - Bolero - Choreography on Broadway - Dance education - English ballet - Indian classical dance - Italian ballet - List of dance companies - Meg Stuart - Opera ballet - Sasha Waltz - Scotch reel - Set dance - Physically integrated dance
To cleanup: Contra dance - Salsa (dance) - Dandiya - Lead and follow
To unbias:
To check for copyvios:
To merge: List of dancers and List of dance personalities‎ as per AfD discussion
Substubs needing expansion: see /substubs
To destub: Amir Hossain Babu - Canada Dance Festival - Dance etiquette - Flash dance - more
Needing references: Chorus line - specifically verifying that each girl actually started out as a chorine
To create: Broadway dance - Country Western Dance International - Dance and cinema - Dance and society - German folk dancing - Latin swing - Post-structuralist ballet - Push (dance) - Salon dance - Shuffle dance - Swing boogie - World Dance Alliance - Xavier Le Roy - more
Wanted Pics/Graphics: Category:Dance articles needing images

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rewrite

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The section, IMO, about the format of this run should be rewritten. Too many run-ons and syntactical errors. YellowAries2010 (talk) 06:33, 31 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

That would be "syntactic" errors. ;) But can you be more specific; there are no syntactic errors that I can see, but I can understand where the wording might cause it to read as vague to some. This occurred to me previously, but the problem is that it's difficult to explain explicitly how things have changed (and still keep to encyclopedic style) without using embedded clauses, due to the fact that the voting results and the performances now overlap from week to week. Honestly I don't think it's going to get too much clearer than it is, but in any event, that section will likely get revised once the first competition episode airs in a couple of weeks, so maybe it will iron itself out. Snow (talk) 13:35, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Results in tables

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I changed the scheme for representing the results as the method being used was needlessly confusing, counter-intuitive, and, in any event, inaccurate -- the judges/producers have said (both on the show and in interviews), that the new week's routines are factored into the elimination decisions at the end of the show, as of course are solos, so eliminations are clearly the product of the show in which they occur and all routines performed up until the moment of elimination. So the "already eliminated" was not just likely to be confusing to the average future users of the tables, it was also inaccurate in that it implied the eliminations are already finalized before the show in which the respective decision is announced, which is not the case. I think the new format not only presents the status/elimination dates more accurately, it also reads more clearly in general and it more closely reflects which performances (all of them, that is) factored into the ultimate decision. Note also that there are many other shows in the SYTYCD franchise which have always had a one-show-per-week format and that their articles (at least the ones that have performance charts), all use something similar to this format (adjusted for the manner in which eliminations are handled on the show, of course) and seem much cleaner for it. Snow (talk) 05:48, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic