Talk:Soapstone

[Untitled]

I think the steatite article should be merged with this one. Does anyone see any reason it should not? Aleta 11:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Aleta

I've merged the text and redirected "steatite" to this article. Now, if someone could merge the histories, that would be helpful! I don't know anything about doing that. Aleta 00:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

English Usage -- SOAPSTone stands for subject, occasion, audience, purpose, speaker, tone. 1veedo 02:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 24.5.11.127 (talk) 02:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Should we include the way Native Californians used it? They traded it- they would make pots and pans, because when soapstone is heated, it heats evenly. --24.5.11.127 (talk) 02:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)WinifredJ

AQBachler (talk) 18:04, 1 November 2010 (UTC) I reverted ladyshallots undo, i informed her on her talk page that a request for citation is not the same as a request for clarification, which seems to be what she wants.

Incorrect; I did not ask for a clarification; I asked for a citation for the explanation that is given. LadyofShalott 03:13, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

I made a small edit - taking out "whiskey stones" as another name for soapstone. It's not. While the stones are made of soapstone, it'd be like calling trees "toothpicks" or "paper" Carbonatedserpentine (talk) 17:35, 14 December 2013 (UTC).

I took this photo at school with several pieces of soap stone and a steel plate with writing from it on it, some one please put it on the page I would screw it up http://i.imgur.com/LXY9rS8.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.1.13.123 (talk) 04:40, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Composition of steatite

The soapstone article states: By mass, steatite is approximately 67% silica and 33% magnesia. However, this cannot be. The author has neglected the mass of water in soapstone (steatite). The phrase would be true only if steatite were calcined to remove all of the water.Thermbal (talk) 04:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Fixed w/ ref. Vsmith (talk) 14:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

"Immediately dangerous..." how?

Is the material gastrointestinally toxic? A neurotoxin? Carcinogenic? Mutagenic? Some slight detail is in order here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.249 (talk) 22:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Soapstone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070222204934/http://www.csasi.org/1998_october_journal/pg201.htm to http://www.csasi.org/1998_october_journal/pg201.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:54, 22 January 2018 (UTC)