Talk:Société Royale Belge de Géographie

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Speedy deletion nom

edit

I believe this article meets the criteria for notability established at WP:Notability. It is an international society that represents Belgium scientific interest in Geography and publishes scientific journals and findings. In that respect it is the Belgian version of the Royal Geographical Society and is as notable as any other scientific society. Admittedly the only info I have on it at the moment is from its own website but a google search will show you its notability in its field - Dumelow (talk) 14:52, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Looks notable to me. Lampman (talk) 15:27, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
I agree. I believe the notification for speedy deletion should be removed immediately. It would appear to me that it's insertion is a mistake. The Société Royale Belge de Géographie is not "a company...that does not indicate the importance...etcetera" in my opinion (as per se the deletion notice distinction CSD A7), but rather a learned society.
This distinction will be added into the opening sentence by me forthwith. Hag2 (talk) 15:39, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, was on Cruise Control when I added this, thought it was another self-promotion and there were no references at the time. Removed the speedy. Message from XENUu, t 20:02, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I normally work on articles in my userspace first but this one was never going to be much more than a stub so I started straight in the mainspace - Dumelow (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Name

edit

Does it have a Flemish/Dutch name? Punkmorten (talk) 20:17, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not that I am aware of, the only references to it I have seen are in French. I will check around on their website though - Dumelow (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Société Royale Belge de Géographie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply