Talk:Social Support Questionnaire

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

Social Support Questionnaire is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Draft 2 Comments

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think your article is very well-written and thorough. I did not find a single spelling/grammar mistake and everything flows well.

Just a few things:

• Your opening sentence could go without the “psychometrically sound” part. To, me that statement makes it sound bias. On a related note, the “borderline” comment on the internal reliability of the SSQ3 might also come off that way. • If you are using the same source in your citations, just hit “re-use” when citing the sources so that the same source does not come up multiple times in your reference list. • Maybe you are planning on doing this later on, but make sure that you are linking out to pages for terms you think may be beneficial to have background on. • I don’t think you need a colon after the “with” when listing the correlates with the SSQ6.

·Brianbizub1 (talk) 03:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft 1 General Comments

The outline looks to be in good shape. I would encourage you to focus on filling out the main sections then returning to the opening paragraph.

Draft 1 Specific Comments

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The opening sentence is too long. Consider shortening it and focusing on the pieces: the SSQ is an X (type of instrument) that measures Y.
Instead of discussing the survey design in the opening paragraph, consider reporting on how the SSQ has been used, who developed it, and its overall reliability and validity.
I like that you are going to include the scoring.
You might want to have a section on how the survey is administered. You indicated there is a two-part process? That's interesting. Is it often done in person or over the phone?
Consider examining the literature to see if the SSQ has been used by researchers or clinicians.

Eva.dugoff (talk) 22:49, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic