Talk:Social studies/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Social studies. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Merger
I think we should refrain from the merger because the "School subjects" are probably targeted for grammer and high school and my experience is that the subject is called "Social studies". This is not cencorship for kids: this just trying to talk in the language that they are familiar with. This is just a persist oddity of schooling: "Social studies" is just social science lite with a lot geography thrown in. -- Fplay 07:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
- There was a very confusing redirect: Social Study → Social Sciences ; created by a non-native speaker of English. Clearly, it should be Social Study → Social Studies. I am going to attribute the merger proposal to this confusing situation and remove the merger tags. The PURPOSE of this page is to accomodate how this amalgam of subjects are aggregated under to rubric "Social Studies". -- Fplay 07:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Any particular reason why this article's font is in pink?
Not that it matters, but I'm curious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sacularamacal13 (talk • contribs) 06:51, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- It does matter lol. It looks like a prank, I changed it back to normal. - Jeeny Talk 08:08, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Inappropriate tone/style
Is this tag still necessary? - Allness Null (talk) 16:28, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
US Only?
Although the article does not say it explicitly, it appears that it is talking about the US primary and secondary school course 'Social Studies'. I think this should be stated explicitly. I think that this course is also taught in other countries apart from the US, so information about where else it is taught too. Maybe some comparisons would be useful also. cheers --Boy.pockets (talk) 00:42, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
NPOV Dispute - Overview
The overview violates Wikipedia's NPOV policy in that it casts social studies, and all social sciences, as pseudoscience, faulting its methodologies and applications. Those need to be explained without claiming that they're contradictory or ineffectual. 2601:281:8300:7B70:5C8F:B028:8ED3:B486 (talk) 00:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)