Talk:Social unit

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

No consensus, 5 June 2022, see discussion.
Procedural close, 21 July 2022, see discussion.
Restored Special:Permalink/475960620 and sent to AfD, 22 April 2022, see discussion.

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Community, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CommunityWikipedia:WikiProject CommunityTemplate:WikiProject CommunityCommunity articles

Sociology

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles

I decided that this term has meaning distinct from the sum of its parts, (e.g. it is not used to describe a model of architecture), and that its users in various disciplines would benefit from a separate article, from which interdisciplinary may grow. I think Friedland's quote on its own gives enough justification for why it is important to define, hence the new article. Any assistance appreciated. Ta, SeventhHell (talk) 06:10, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Propose Merger

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This article is proposed to be merged to article level of analysis as it is the same topic. Meclee (talk) 18:21, 4 January 2012 (UTC) updated =Meclee (talk) 00:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

:Relevant parts of this article were merged into level of analysis. As there were no comments regarding merger, am redirecting to level of analysis.  Meclee (talk) 18:36, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic