Talk:Societas cooperativa Europaea

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cooperatives (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles

European Union Low‑importance

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of legal entity types by country#European Economic Area (including the European Union)|type]] The anchor (#European Economic Area (including the European Union)) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[List of legal entity types by country#European Economic Area (including the European Union)|Types of legal European business entities]] The anchor (#European Economic Area (including the European Union)) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

How can this article be expanded?

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can you help to expand this article yourself by writing content for some of the sections, or recruit an expert to help with any of the sections? Thanks! Djmackenzie (talk) 18:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC) -- revised at 16:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Spelling: 'cooperative' or 'co-operative'; US or British English?

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This topic is in need of attention from an expert on the subject.

The section or sections that need attention may be noted in a message below.

In the EU Regulation and Directive on the SCE, the name of the legal form which is the subject of this article is written 'European Cooperative Society'. But whereas 'cooperative' is the American spelling [1], British English writes 'co-operative' (Oxford English Dictionary, not publicly available online; although Cambridge Dictionaries Online is unsure). In addition, the European Commission itself seems unsure; it uses British/hyphenated spelling consistently here. Potential English-speaking users of the SCE legal form are not only British - so this isn't just a British concern, although in Europe, spoken and written English is, as far as I know and as far as 'co-operative' is concerned, the same as British English (except perhaps in the European institutions). The International Co-operative Alliance and Cooperatives Europe seem to prefer the hyphenated spelling on their web sites.

Wikipedia's Manual of Style lists 'Consistency within articles' and 'Strong national ties to a topic' as factors to consider when deciding which spelling conventions to use, and specifically says that articles about European Union institutions should use British English. Similarly, according to the Manual of Style (spelling), the EU uses 'standard' British English. Concerning hyphens, the Manual of Style suggests that "A clear tendency is emerging to join both elements in all varieties of English (subsection)... The hyphen is usually used when the letters brought into contact are the same (nonlinear, subabdominal, but non-negotiable, sub-basement) or are vowels (intra-atomic, pre-existing, semi-intensive, co-opt)..."

The European Commission's English style guide for translators (October 2007 revision) cited in European English says (p. 14; para. 1.51) that "If [prefixes] are of Latin or Greek origin, however, they tend to drop the hyphen as they become established", and (p. 15; para. 1.54) that "Hyphens are often used to avoid juxtaposing two consonants or two vowels ... However, the hyphen is often omitted in frequently used words", in both paragraphs citing 'cooperation' as an example of an un-hyphenated (or should that be unhyphenated!) word.

We have a problem! Although there is ambiguity, I suggest that this article on the SCE should use what seems to be the conventional British and European/international spelling (co-operative) except in the title 'European Cooperative Society' itself. In other words, the spelling 'Cooperative' in the SCE's English title must be reproduced as it is spelled in the laws establishing it, but when mentioning co-operatives generally (and for other purposes), the article should use spelling which is relevant to Europeans - and that is British English. Do you agree?

Djmackenzie (talk) 21:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC) -- revised at 16:10, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

This would be an excellent article to have. My idea/suggestion if you like is to ask the Commission itself to provide the missing parts of the article, to the extent that this would be allowed under the wiki policy of "no original research".

One area of practical application which I think should be specifically included in the article structure is how the SCE's incorporated to date have dealt with the issue of profits tax. I would suppose that the Sixth Directive would give fairly adequate and comprehensive guidance with relation to Value Added Tax, but with regards to profit tax (Corporation tax) there is as far as my knowledge extends no finished Directive on harmonisation, and the ideas of the SCE pretty much break the model for the avoidance of dual taxation envisaged by the OECD. Both from a practical standpoint and also from an academic standpoint will be very interesting to know how the European Commission would suggest that the matter was dealt with. Uncle Davey (Talk) 16:24, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Societas cooperativa Europaea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic