This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've been looking at some of the efforts of the SEJ and have noted that it tends to side with popular, but not necessarily scientifically accepted information. It recently gave an award to Carey Gillam (formerly of Reuters) for her book "Whitewash" (ISBN-13: 978-1610918329) which is part of the attempt by "green" groups to have the popular herbicide, glyphosate banned by connecting it with multiple cancers. I note that they similarly awarded Sharon Lerner for this article https://theintercept.com/2016/11/25/did-the-epa-prosecute-and-jail-a-mississippi-lab-owner-because-of-her-activism/ although reading the court documents that I have been able to find and Ms. White's failed appeal (Case: 13-60649, Document: 00512914081 Mississippi fifth circuit). It's clear that the entire piece is seriously biased. Clearly this is just my opinion but I'm left-leaning and the usual conservative critic. I think it behoves others to look into this and add this to the section on criticism. 81.97.100.208 (talk) 10:29, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
