Talk:Soedardjat Nataatmadja
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Amkgp in topic Did you know nomination
A news item involving Soedardjat Nataatmadja was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 7 December 2020. |
A fact from Soedardjat Nataatmadja appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 December 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk) 19:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Soedardjat Nataatmadja's (pictured) instruction for parliamentary
attendantsobservers to wear traditional Sundanese clothing cost him his reelection? Source: see Soedardjat Nataatmadja#Sundanese culture and rejection for reelection
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Alatyr (mythology)
- Comment: I don't know if readers would perceive this hook as intended in the article, so please give your suggestions for improvements.
Created by Jeromi Mikhael (talk). Self-nominated at 11:06, 5 December 2020 (UTC).
- This has been nominated for Recent Deaths, which will not interfere with the DYK appearance. Article is new enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced. As all sources are foreign-language, unable to check for close paraphrasing. Images are public domain, but this one is very blurry.
- Hook is interesting, but an inline cite is needed for this sentence:
This incident culminated in Rudini refusing to recognize the reelection of Nataatmadja.
I also wonder if you can use a shorter word thanattendants
, as the hook is full of long words. Maybemembers
? QPQ done. Yoninah (talk) 18:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Attendants here means anyone who is invited to the election, including press, members, wife of members, husband of members, etc. Inline cite incoming.
- @Yoninah: I've done your request.
- @Jeromi Mikhael: Thank you for the cite. Then the expression is "parliamentary observers". Yoninah (talk) 18:12, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: ALT1:
... that Soedardjat Nataatmadja's (pictured) instruction for parliamentary attendants to wear traditional Sundanese clothing cost him his reelection?Source: see Soedardjat Nataatmadja#Sundanese culture and rejection for reelection Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 03:20, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeromi Mikhael: ALT1 is the same as ALT0. All I want to do is replace "attendants" with "observers". Yoninah (talk) 13:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah:My bad. Didn't notice that. I'll replace it right now. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 14:03, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Done.
- Thank you. I changed it in the hook too. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 18:43, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: ALT1:
- @Yoninah: I've done your request.