Talk:Soedardjat Nataatmadja

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Amkgp in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk19:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
Soedardjat Nataatmadja

Created by Jeromi Mikhael (talk). Self-nominated at 11:06, 5 December 2020 (UTC).Reply

  •   This has been nominated for Recent Deaths, which will not interfere with the DYK appearance. Article is new enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced. As all sources are foreign-language, unable to check for close paraphrasing. Images are public domain, but this one is very blurry.
  • Hook is interesting, but an inline cite is needed for this sentence: This incident culminated in Rudini refusing to recognize the reelection of Nataatmadja. I also wonder if you can use a shorter word than attendants, as the hook is full of long words. Maybe members? QPQ done. Yoninah (talk) 18:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Yoninah: Attendants here means anyone who is invited to the election, including press, members, wife of members, husband of members, etc. Inline cite incoming.
@Yoninah: I've done your request.
@Yoninah: Done.