This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The recent expansion from stub to article was a great step in the direction to formal review for "Good Article". Areas of expansion could be: Opposing arguments of the UK at trial and expansion of the importance/significance section to include references to articles on human rights, death penalty etc. (for instance: petioner's use of the case in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, Supreme Court justice Breyer's opinions etc.). I have initially rated it as "mid" importance, but it may be assessed as "high" or "low" importance depending on alternative viewpoints. Legis Nuntius (talk) 22:24, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
