 | Soft lithography was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 1, 2006). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
‹See TfM›
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Good Article nomination has failed
editThe Good article nomination for Soft lithography has failed, for the following reason:
- There is no real prose here to review. Both main sections are lists - they should be converted to normal prose. Also (in the words of Rogers and Nuzzo, p. 50, as cited in "References") is unnecessarily verbose - use the <ref> tag to indicate where statements are sourced from. See m:Cite.php. Worldtraveller 21:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Ok we need to form a project or at least a taskforce to clean this area up. I will attempt to do so in the next few daysUser:mystic force
This article is a confused mess. It is titled soft lithography, but spends most of its space discussing microcontact printing. In some places, it discusses microcontact printing as something that can be done with soft lithography (true), but in others it seems to be using the term soft lithography to refer to only microcontact printing. 152.20.154.200 (talk) 15:30, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
ODT?
editIs ODT octadecanethiol? Moletrouser (talk) 10:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)