Talk:Software Freedom Day

2012 March update

Cleaned the discussion page and removed the "what happened" and "why this date" sections as I believe both are answered in the main article. Now what to do with the comment on the top of the page and the Wikipedia notability? There are hundreds of press reports worldwide about specific events but none related to SFD/SFI itself as SFI is just the 'global organizer'. Should we just pasted and reference some of the media coverage which can be found @ http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/en/sfd/press-coverage ? Thanks.

I removed the tag, as the person adding it gave no reason to why he was adding it and clearly did no research on the matter (a drive-by tagging). The above link has a few, but google has a bunch more, particular significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This other article, beyond being a independent source, also show the notability of the subject. Even doing a 1 sec googeling, country specific for Sweden, and I get local computer news paper (old wood style paper) with a article which main topic is Software Freedom Day. We had sun in 2008 sponsorship it, which of course was mentioned in the press. I do not know what more would be needed to prove that it passed the General notability guideline. Belorn (talk) 20:04, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! (same user as above - maybe one day I'll register :) ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.121.75.112 (talk) 11:44, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

You're not supposed to "clean[] the discussion page" by simply deleting stuff! If anything it should've been archived. See WP:ARCHIVENOTDELETE. I haven't editied WP in years but I felt the need to say something. Fitfatfighter (talk) 00:12, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Software Freedom Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100918055242/http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/en/sfd/press-coverage to http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/en/sfd/press-coverage

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:37, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Who is SFI?

Can we get clarification on who or what SFI is? It is used three times throughout the article, yet it is never defined nor linked. Thanks. WesT (talk) 22:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Looks like "Software Freedom International" changed to "Digital Freedom Foundation" and the article got updated with the new name but a few SFI's got missed. The diff showing the original name change is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Software_Freedom_Day&diff=next&oldid=641887306 I've just updated them to DFF in an update. PuZZleDucK (talk) 10:47, 12 July 2020 (UTC)