Talk:Software management review

Untitled

I suggest that the content of this page should be moved to "software management review", where there is currently a redirection to this page. This page ("management review") would then be available for a more generic approach (e.g., management review of employee performance, etc.). Either multiple entries with cross-reference, or disambiguation, should direct the interested reader from "management review" to "software management review". Related articles on "software review" and "software peer review" already reference "software management review". "Software audit" does not, but needs editing to bring it into line with IEEE Std. 1028 provisions.

-- Donmillion 28 April 2006

Agreed. Change done. So far, the page "management review" redirects to "software management review" but in the future, it could become a disambiguation page offering the multiple entries you propose.

-- Vasywriter August 2, 2012

Article seems senseless

In its present form this article doesn't seem to make much sense. The impression I have is that it is somehow related to the IEEE but I couldn't find any direct mention of this in any of the links from that article.

Perhaps this article would be best as a section or a sub page of the IEEE article, if it indeed is part of their standards or program, or -as another possibility, perhaps a renaming of the article to something like "IEEE: Management review".

I have just completed a review of the original article and can now see that it has lost much of its sense through the various edits which it has gone through.

An essential element of this particular article is its relationship to the IEEE and its procedures. The dropping of this aspect to a subordinate position in the article is part of the reason the article seems senseless.

If there is a more general application of the process of "management review" this has to be worked into the article with more care than the manner in which it was treated. --JAXHERE | Talk 20:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)