Talk:Soham (Sanskrit)

Cleanup

This article needs:

• A more encyclopedic tone
• Proper formatting (remove use of all caps)
• Proper references (i.e. book references) and citations

—Hanuman Das 18:13, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

You can say that again. Sardaka (talk) 09:18, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Edit Notes

• Added word तेजो (meaning light) missing in the Isha Upanishad verse listed in the History section. The English translation below the Sanskrit verse is incomplete without initial word तेजो (tejo/tejas).

ONCE AND FOR ALL: THE CORRECT JAPA TECHNIQUE

Once and for all, to whoever is deleting my editing in this matter — the correct japa of hamsa (or so'ham) mantra is: "ham" with the inhalation and "sa" (or "so") with the exhalation.

You may check the authorized and reliable work of Swami Muktananda, I Am That: The Science of Hamsa from the Vijnana Bhairava (Siddha Yoga Publications, 1992) and the Vijnana Bhairava itself, verse 24.

If you have a more reliable source for the reversal of syllables ("sa" or "so" with inbreath and "ham" with outbreath) please quote it.Orlando F (talk) 20:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Although the original "so" on inhalation and "ham" on exhalation that you have overwritten a number of times, was not supported by citations, it is verifiably inaccurate of you to claim - in all good faith, I think - that '"ham" with the inhalation and "sa" (or "so") with the exhalation"' is "the correct japa". I can understand, if you got frustrated over seeing your edit reversed to the original without citations of references, but using majuscules is not Good practise and adding finality ("once and for all") to your POV does not make it true. I will try to find time to add greater balance to the article. MarB4 (talk) 13:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Etymology

''{{IAST|so 'ham}}'' is the same as the mantra ''hamsa'' <ref>''Ham'' with the inhalation and ''sa'' with the exhalation.</ref> ("I Am That").

While the relation between soham and hamsa is relevant, the inclusion of a reference to a note on practice rather than a source is less obvious. I suggest the reference be removed and included with source citation under a separate appropriate heading. MarB4 (talk) 15:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Soham (Sanskrit). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090204191352/http://muktabodhalib.org:80/SECURE/KSTS/ksts_series_index.htm to http://www.muktabodhalib.org/SECURE/KSTS/ksts_series_index.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090204191352/http://muktabodhalib.org:80/SECURE/KSTS/ksts_series_index.htm to http://www.muktabodhalib.org/SECURE/KSTS/ksts_series_index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)