 | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 July 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
"second-lowest of any cycle to date"
editI believe that Solar Cycle 5 had the lowest (not second-lowest) maximum of any numbered sunspot cycle. So is the implied reference (to another cycle with an even lower maximum) referring to the unnumbered cycles during the Maunder Minimum? NCdave (talk) 20:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Solar cycle 6 had a max of 81.2 which was lower than SC5. I've added in a link for clarification. Primefac (talk) 20:42, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you. That's interesting, because the "400 years" graph shows SC6 peaking quite a bit higher than SC5.
Sunspot changes
editChanging topics... I think the v.1 to v.2 sunspot number change made by Jan Janssens (STCE) on 24 May 2017 needs some explanation. I propose changing the Solar Cycle articles to make it clear which version is which. Please discuss it here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Solar_cycle_2#Huge_change_in_max_smoothed_sunspot_number NCdave (talk) 07:58, 10 November 2017 (UTC)