Talk:Soldier's Medal

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Latest recipient?

edit

I see at least three different "latest recipients" in this article. Anyone want to clear this one up? --Scottie theNerd 01:47, 11 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Soldier's Medal is a medal with some prestige, as it is the highest non-combatant bravery award the Army has, but it is not an uncommon award. There are at least several dozen awards per year. So there is no point in having a "latest recipient" listed, as it will be constantly out of date. I am removing, pending rethinking how this article should be rewritten. Airbornelawyer 23:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree. The "latest recipient" portion is already outdated. Should be removed entirely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ink170 (talkcontribs) 08:26, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Category

edit

I've created a category for recipients here, and redirected the list of recipients to this article. Everyone who was on the list, and whose article confirms they were awarded it, has been added - since there were no citations on the list, I felt it best to look for some confirmation. Shimgray | talk | 13:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Soldier's Medal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:38, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply