Talk:Soleilmoon Recordings

Latest comment: 1 year ago by RockabillyRaccoon in topic Third party sources for SPLC designation and removal

Copyvio

edit

This article is pretty much a copy and paste of Soleilmoon's website: http://www.soleilmoon.com/store/aboutUs.lasso Katr67 18:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

SPLC

edit

I'd just like to say FUCK the SPLC for putting Soleilmoon on their hitlist and the prominence it's given in this entry. Yes, it is relevant and noteworthy, but not to the point that it overshadows the extent of the label's importance. Also, I feel one organization's smearing of Soleilmoon's reputation on it's absurdly exaggerated list is an example of making someone else the focus of an article that isn't about them. Lemonlimeotter (talk) 14:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Third party sources for SPLC designation and removal

edit

Are there any third party sources on SPLC's designation and removal of the label from the hate list? The citation for the label being removed from the list is the list itself, for example. Third party sources unaffiliated with either the SPLC or the label should be cited to prevent a conflict of interest in the coverage, and unless the SPLC's list includes organizations that were once on the list, but later removed, I'm not sure how that citation is supposed to verify that the label was removed from the list. RockabillyRaccoon (talk) 14:59, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply