Talk:Solitude

untitled

This page is full of religious mumbo jumbo from the get-go. How is that unbiased?

--- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.145.62 (talk) 16:35, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

---

To reply to 90.198.145.62, sought-after solitude often has religious dimensions. Also, I reject the comment directly below me. Volpeculus sagacis (talk) 04:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

---

I know for a fact that some mental illnesses, like autism and aspergers syndrome, cause a strong desire to be alone and isolated, shouldn't those be included? (by the way, those are the only two I know of)

page about buddhist beliefs regarding solitude?

This page seems to just lead into a description of the importance of solitude to Buddhist monks. It never explicitly says this, and so is highly suspect. Fuzzform 03:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Scrap that part or rewrite it to encompass more religions than Buddhism.

Plenty left to do here

You seem at home with this subject, and have made a good start. You might consider adding sections on the other religious traditions' views on solitude. for instance, there is a long history of Christian reclusives. Thomas Merton is a very approachable example of the Christian monk. Marsha Sinetar, in her book, "Ordinary People as Monks and Mystics" makes a very strong case for secular solitude. The Taoists were often said to be found, "Cloud hidden, whereabouts unknown". And perhaps you could discuss solitude as a part of the day, rather than a vocation, for instance people who work instensively with people for a living (social workers, prison guards, teachers) but choose to live alone at home to "recharge theier batteries". Keep up the good work! Soltera 18:45, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

(I removed the thing about young people being better at solitude than older people. How stupid!)

Sole Satisfier link

Is there any justification for inclusion of a link to the Sole Satisfier== article? I can't see that it has anything to do with this article.--RLent (talk) 18:29, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Any information on the difference between solitude and loneliness? --wiki4Imo--- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki4imo (talk • contribs) 16:53, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Negative

This article is unnecessarily negative. There is no mention of solitude as a prerequisite for artistic effort, as a source of comfort or as a way to reduce stress. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.93.220.49 (talk) 04:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

I just added some positive material. More is needed. It is strange how the Wikiquote page[1] is all positive and Wikipedia page (was) all negative on solitude. N6n (talk) 15:26, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

The very first paragraph states "It may stem from bad relationships, loss of loved ones, deliberate choice, infectious disease, mental disorders, neurological disorders or circumstances of employment or situation (see castaway)." This makes Solitude sound like a disease! A desire to be alone is NOT a disease! Solitude is not the same as loneliness or (excessive, involuntary) isolation. --71.10.155.250 (talk) 00:53, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Agreed. Whoever wrote this, has a strong focus on not being able to be by themselves. The description lists exclusively negative reasons for feeling the urge to live in solitude. The whole text reminds me of the good old "Being by yourself is not healthy" BS some friends from the US were taught in elementary school. --88.65.212.202 (talk) 01:51, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

I have tried to make the introduction a little more balanced. Please review and improve. Ckoerner (talk) 21:31, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

"mindfulness" buddhababble

This is highly questionable, and probably doesn't belong in the lede as currently written as it emphasizes spiritual drivel in a context where physical isolation was supposed to be being contrasted with its other. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 23:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

ambiguity between this and another page.

On the solitude page, it mentions that solitude has been distinguished from loneliness esp. as a positive correlative. On the emotional insecurity page, it states that the greater the insecurity, the greater the isolation becomes. When you click on isolation, it redirects to the solitude page. This is inherently contradictory, as emotional insecurity is pejorative (if not at least a negative quality). Maybe a disambiguity page with solitude, isolation, and sequestration could be made for this dubious affair. (75.71.118.98 (talk) 15:01, 14 September 2012 (UTC))

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Solitude. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050322131526/http://www.eastandard.net:80/archives/august/wed25082004/executives/upfront/upfront02.htm to http://www.eastandard.net/archives/august/wed25082004/executives/upfront/upfront02.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Solitude. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130215035154/http://www.singlescafe.net:80/solitude.html to http://www.singlescafe.net/solitude.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111130075821/http://www.uplink.com.au:80/lawlibrary/Documents/Docs/Doc82.html to http://www.uplink.com.au/lawlibrary/Documents/Docs/Doc82.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:42, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

What does this mean?

What does this mean: "In the edited work, Coplan and Bowker invite note only fellow psychology colleagues to chime in on this issue, but they also invited variety of other factuly from different disciplines to address the issue."? 109.154.59.177 (talk) 19:37, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

I note that the same statement is unclear. May need to be deleted. Dr.khatmando (talk) 03:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Jacques Bodin, De dos XXXXV, oil on canvas.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Media and Culture Theory - MDC 254

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Af975949 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Mosbug1 (talk) 02:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)