Talk:Solomon Islands at the 2008 Summer Olympics

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Solomon Islands at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 11:08, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

• will review. MathewTownsend (talk) 11:08, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

review

• This is a nice little article. I've made some copy edits.[1] You are free to revert them if you disagree. I've just a few suggestions:
  • They all look good. Thanks. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 16:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
• "including three male athletes participating in two sports." - composed of three male atheltes"?
  • Fixed. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 16:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
• "26 year old:" 26-year-old - should be hyphenated
  • I've changed it as such. I've never seen it written that way, though. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 16:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
• "ni-Vanuatu sprinter" what is ni-Vanuatu"?
  • "ni-Vanuatu" is the nation's demonym. I've wikilinked it to the country as a clarification. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 16:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
• "He ranked 68th out of the 80" - who is the "he" (can figure it out only by looking back several names).
  • Fixed. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 16:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
• "85 athletes participated in the qualification heats," - not supposed to start a sentence with an number
  • Rearranged. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 16:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
• "twelfth place of the twelve athletes in the event, behind the Phillippines' Hidilyn Diaz (192 kilograms) and Poland's Marieta Gotfryd (200 kilograms)" - and nine others also?
  • I've emphasized that those athletes were respectively in eleventh and tenth place. Let me know what you think. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 16:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
• Will put on hold while you respond.

MathewTownsend (talk) 14:24, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

That should be everything. I additionally revised a note saying that Guadalcanal was the main Solomon Island (even though it has the capital, it is not the most populous island, so to say that may have been POV on my part), in case you checked back and noticed the extra copyedit I made. Thanks for reviewing the article, and I'm glad you enjoyed reading it. :) --Starstriker7^(Talk) 16:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

• Great! Here's a link to the MoS on hyphens: Mos:Hyphens. I think I'm reading it right, but maybe not! MathewTownsend (talk) 18:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:

   b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:

   b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:

   c. no original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.

   fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   no edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Pass!

Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 18:25, 15 July 2012 (UTC)