Talk:Somethin' Else (Cannonball Adderley album)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Bardobro in topic Bangoon "hard bop" or "bebop?"

Rangoon or Bangoon?

edit

The article notes (track 6 on the CD) to be "Bangoon" whereas I believe it's "Rangoon." Is this a mistake, or is the RVG Edition CD release a mistake? Gautam Discuss 17:35, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm looking at the Blue Note release (US 1987 Compact disk), which simply lists this track as "Alison's Uncle" and notes that it did not appear on the LP. This is also how it is listed at the All Music Guide.[1] The AMG also has the RVG edition listing it as "Rangoon" which at least is a real word (Rangoon? Crab rangoon!?!).[2] -MrFizyx 18:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Interesting, at least. Rangoon is certainly a real place, and in fact it is capital of Myanmar if memory serves me correctly. Gautam Discuss 21:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
I believe I read somewhere that Cannonball later rerecorded the track on some other album and named it Bangoon there, maybe someone can verify this? 76.240.40.85 (talk) 17:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Length 43:41

edit

I don't know the policy on this, but the Length 43:41 is not correct for the original release. 43:41 includes the 1999 bonus track "Bangoon". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.185.235.228 (talk) 20:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bangoon "hard bop" or "bebop?"

edit

The article notes that the bonus track "Bangoon" is "more hard bop in tone than the rest of the record," but to my ear sounds more like classic bebop, while the rest of the album is on the "cool" side of hard bop. Any experts care to revisit this? ThanksBardobro (talk) 18:18, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Somethin' Else (Cannonball Adderley album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Start class:
  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox
  •  Y A lead section giving an overview of the album
  •  Y A track listing
  •  Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
  •  Y Categorisation at least by artist and year

C class:

  •  Y All the start class criteria
  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
  •  N At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  •  Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  •  Y A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.

B class:

  •  N All the C class criteria
  •  Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  •  N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  •  N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
  •  N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS
Needs to be split in more sections. Lacks prose and citations. Andrzejbanas (talk) 05:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 05:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 06:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)