Wikipedia

Talk:Something Nice Back Home

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
Good articleSomething Nice Back Home has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSomething Nice Back Home is part of the Lost (season 4) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 13, 2008Good article nomineeListed
August 1, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Reception?

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Where's the reception section like the other episodes? 70.52.133.15 (talk) 21:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sceptre was scheduled to write it; however, he told me two hours ago that he is "not really in an article-writing mood recently". But have no fear, for I will write it soon! –thedemonhog talk • edits 21:59, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Okay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.133.15 (talk) 22:21, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
By the way in Ji Yeon right at the begining before Sun calls 911 she's putting on make-up. Then she starts to feel pain and drops her lipstick and it says DHARMA on it! Should someone put that in Triva? Or would that go to Lostpedia? I'd do it but they blocked IPs. Could someone let them know? 70.52.133.15 (talk) 22:25, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Scar

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Jack has appendix opertion. But on begining of episod, when he walks without blouse, he hes no scar (it's in the future) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.158.161.37 (talk) 11:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

He does have a scar. You can see it when he looks in the mirror. Jackieboy87 (talk) 15:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Aaron

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Should it be noted that Jack now (future) knows that he and Claire share the same father? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.96.78.130 (talk) 01:50, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

It would if we knew that to be true. –thedemonhog talk • edits 05:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
It is true Jack said something like "You are even related to him (Aaron)." This highly suggests that Jack knows he is related to Aaron (which we already know). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.170.209.16 (talk) 14:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Jack does say that, but that does not necessarily mean that Jack knows that Aaron is his nephew. –thedemonhog talk • edits 05:16, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Actually it does as Claire's mom told Jack in te latest episode. Plus the way he said it 100% implies he knew. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.96.78.130 (talk) 20:01, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sawyer

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

It may not sound as good, but I'm sorry - as of this ep we do not know if Sawyer stayed on the island by choice or not - all we know is that Jack says that. Let's try to stick to what is said in each ep, not how we or anyone interprets it. I'm reverting. Tvoz/talk 02:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree, besides I'm sure we'll find out definitively two weeks from now. Jackieboy87 (talk) 05:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Jack (paraphrasing): Sawyer chose to stay on the island.
Interpretation: Sawyer chose to stay on the island. –thedemonhog talk • edits 05:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Per your edit summary: I didn't say that he was lying, I said that we don't independently know that this is a fact and we shouldn't make assumptions about their private conversations. Maybe it's Jack's spin that Sawyer chose to say - who knows at this point in time. Just like we didn't say that Jack was implying that he was related to Aaron while Kate was not, because at the time of this ep we don't know that Jack in fact does know this. Tvoz/talk 07:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Jack implying that he knows that Aaron is his nephew is different. Jack says "You're not even related to him". This could easily be said by any one of the characters and there is no "I" or "but others are" in his statement. Jack saying "[Sawyer] made his choice. He chose to stay" has no implications because it is explicit. –thedemonhog talk • edits 21:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Something Nice Back Home/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I'll be doing the GA review for this article. Overall, it looks really good, but here are some minor suggestions for improvement:

  • If there are going to be sources in the lead, all the info subject to be challenged should be sourced. For example, "thirteen million American viewers—the smallest audience for an original episode of Lost in the show's history." should have a citation.
  • In the lead, it might be a good idea to clarify that Christian is Jack's dead father. That will make it clearer for someone who may not watch the show.
  • "The episode had been written" --> "The episode was written" and "Shooting had begun by March 24" --> "Shooting began by March 24" - it sounds cleaner
  • Over half of the sentences in the reception section begin "(Person) of (publication)...". Is there any other way to word these sorts of sentences?
  • The large numbers need commas where there are currently spaces. See MOS:NUM#Large numbers.

Great job. The article will be on hold for seven days. Nikki311 01:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

With the exception of your first suggestion, all concerns have been addressed. The only citations in the lead references claims that are not repeated later in the article. –thedemonhog talk • edits 04:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Okay. Fair enough. Great work. The article has passed. Nikki311 02:21, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Something Nice Back Home. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Something Nice Back Home. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Something_Nice_Back_Home&oldid=1205358509"