Talk:Son
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 April 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article was selected as the article for improvement on 20 October 2012 for a period of one week. |
Untitled
editCan anyone move this article to Son (disambiguation) and make an article on the model of daughter, which already has a well-written encyclopedic article?? Georgia guy 17:21, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Ok, let me check first. There are a lot of pages linked to this. -- Viajero 19:40, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you request to move Son to any other page. I went to the places you pointed and there are no articles to the extent you've mentioned. Most other sites where the rhythm Son appears, are misinformed and hold no informational value at all for the intelligent reader like you.
- Is that "wiggers/chiggers" stuff accurate or hooey? Someone does seem pissed about this article! --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 21:47, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
As things stand there's no real article here, so why not just make it a redirect until one can be written? Either than or move the contents of Son (disambiguation) here. --Daduzi talk 16:54, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm certain that the usage of Son in a slang context is not limited to America, especially in terms of the first context described. It has enjoyed common usage in the UK for many years and this should be reflected in the article.
The slang hip-hop modern American use (which is extremely annoying) is distinctly different from the Adult to Child usage that previously predominated in both America and Britain; the distinction should be made... and the people who use "son" like others would use "dude" should be shot. Please, for the love of all that is good... kill these people - sterilize them! 76.194.215.208 (talk) 02:09, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Son as an address from someone unrelated
editThere have been instances of people addressing younger men as "son" even though they are not in any way their parents and therefore unrelated.
This article does not address this at all and should be rectified.
I particularly like to know why this particular form of address got developed. 49.3.72.79 (talk) 16:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)