Talk:Sonic Jump Fever

April Canadian release

Did this really happen? I didn't think this was even announced yet at this point. The source isn't working for me, so I cant check that... Sergecross73 msg me 00:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm having trouble pinning down the exact release date (either April 16 or 17), but it appears this was indeed downloadable back in April in the Canadian iTunes Store only. From what I can tell from reading some sources of questionable reliability, it was a quiet surprise release with no announcement, but it was only available on the Canadian store.[1][2][3] The iTunes link that is currently cited in the article appears to verify that this is indeed a downloadable application in that store, with the latest version released on June 12. On June 10, 2014, this game was announced officially to be releasing sometime this summer. See Sega-released trailer[4][5] In hindsight, it was probably a bad idea to import gameplay content from the Sonic wikia, since it's probably original research. Mz7 (talk) 03:57, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, none of those sources would be an RS. If anything, I think this should be removed from the lead, and put into the dev section/explained if we can find some better sourcing.... Sergecross73 msg me 14:59, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

 Removed for now Mz7 (talk) 17:31, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Merge with Sonic Jump?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I am proposing we merge this article with the article for the first Jump game as there really isn't enough citations for this game to be considered notable, and all of the information here can be easily explained in the Legacy section. Shadowboxer2005 (talk) 12:44, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

• Oppose - They're both separate games with separate RS coverage. I see no reason why such a move would be an improvement. Sergecross73 msg me 12:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
• Oppose There are plenty of citations in the article already, and I found this, this, and this. The article is small, but could be expanded easily. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:13, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

  I agree. They have separate RS and citations independent of each other. Blitzfan51 the manager 17:12, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.