Talk:Sonic the Hedgehog 4: Episode II

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Name of this game

edit

Why isn't this game simply called Sonic the Hedgehog 5?? It's the fifth game, isn't it?? Georgia guy (talk) 00:51, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

The guys who created the game, SEGA wanted to name it Episode II, as it is the same thing as Sonic 4: Episode 1. Here's teh reason --82.139.5.13 (talk) 13:54, 29 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Source 23, unreliable?

edit

I have noticed that Source 23 has been tagged as 'unreliable' and would like for us to gain some community consensus as to whether the tag should go (the source is relaible) or if the source should go (the source is UNreliable). How might be the best way to go about gaining some consensus on this? MIVP - Allow us to be of assistance to you. (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) 10:43, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm pretty sure it was kept as a compromise for a stubborn IP/editor who kept adding it. It's not a reliable source as far as what WP:VG/RS deems acceptable, so I'm all for removal unless someone can provide a reliable replacement source. Sergecross73 msg me 13:46, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Sonic the Hedgehog 4: Episode II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply