Talk:Sonja Biserko/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Sonja Biserko. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Neutrality issues
This article (particularly the lede) seems biased against this person. I know nothing about this person, but I get the sense reading the article that it is weighted heavily towards information designed to make her look bad. Take for example this passage:
Some intellectuals (including those outside Serbia[7]) speculate that she has a hidden agenda for her actions against Serbia, which is gaining vast amounts of monetary profit from certain international funds[8]. This allegation is supported by the fact that even her own sister Ljiljana Gliglić (formerly Biserko) stated that she doesn't want to talk to Sonja due to her "anti-Serbian hysteria".[9][10]
You know its bad when we're bringing her sister into it! Ltwin (talk) 15:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- It's true it's biased "supported by the fact that her sister stated"... Statement is not a fact. But however I must note, that even tho, I have no any information about this person, her actions are directly attacking freedoms of Serbs and I know this from first hand. While being in Montenegro, and having family in it, I know what my family was experiencing by the government, because they are Serbs. My brother had to apply to party to get a job in a police, so they can prove how Serbs are part of the Government. Churches in Montenegro are held by MCP, that are under Serbian Patriarchy, and they were legal contenders of the monasteries in Montenegro, however that was hard to prove by documents, as there were no requirements by government to register church and land. What happened now is that government is messing by making law to legally take out land from the MCP that has majority of Christian Orthodox (80%) supporters in Montenegro, and incorporate their OWN church, that is not recognized by anyone in Christian world, and most probably supported by government. That is neither proof of sovereignty of some country, but proof, that current party can write any law against the will of the people. And whatever she said about this situation, I KNOW in person that she is lying. Unfortunately I have no proof of this, and neither I know reasons why she does this, either agenda, lobbyists or whatever and more importantly my knowledge only doesn't have enough credibility to be wikipedia in wikipedia article, but I believe that there are (a lot) very pro-Western forces in Serbia that have pretty negative opinion about this lady. 61.245.170.181 (talk)
- @Ltwin:, I am very pro-Western, and I support usually the human rights movements, so I am usually don't intervene in the cases to avoid to be accused of pro-Western bias. Also I am still novice here. May I ask admins with experience for help in Teahouse? PoetVeches (talk) 17:25, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo:, thank you for help to clean up. PoetVeches (talk) 18:05, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- Honest to God, I don't know enough about the politics of the Balkans to have a bias, because I don't claim to have any opinion whatsoever.
GMGtalk 18:20, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- Honest to God, I don't know enough about the politics of the Balkans to have a bias, because I don't claim to have any opinion whatsoever.
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:25, 5 May 2020 (UTC)