Talk:Sonnet 129/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Xover in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Xover (talk · contribs) 20:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Overall status

edit
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Beginning review, more to come. --Xover (talk) 20:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Given the apparent extensive copyright violation in this article (5 sections, quite literally half the article, are in whole or in part verbatim copies of various web pages; who knows how much has been copied from offline sources), I'm not going to bother reviewing it in detail.

I'm quickfailing this review. Please feel free to renominate once you've resolved the copyright violations in the article. --Xover (talk) 21:09, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Detailed points

edit
Lede
  • (6) The article lacks illustrations. Could perhaps a cropped scan of this sonnet from the 1609 quarto be added?
  • Large portions of the lede is copied verbatim from poetryfoundation.org and as such is a copyright violation. The entire section will have to be rewritten from scratch.
Paraphrase
Structure
Context
Couplet