 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Lengthy list of criticism NPOV?
editRoughly half of the current article concerns the criticism of this phone, which I don't think reflects the market's and consumers' view of this product. I have the following specific issues:
- Some of the referenced reviews were based on pre-release software that can contain numerous bugs never present in phones being made available to customers.
- Some of the sources for the critique are anonymous comments on blogs and review sites (and I can't locate some of the comments, even given the URL). These are hardly quality sources that should be used in this context.
Now, the phone has problems and I don't mind that they're listed here if they are balanced in length and verifiable with quality sources. Normally I would've edited the article myself, but I'm rather new to enwp and NPOV-templating in particular so I want to be a little careful. –Magnus Bäck (talk) 23:05, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Merger
editI'm leaving this here for now as it has a sliver of asserted notability, not sure if it should be merged however as everymost notable information about the phone is already in the proposed list (which btw was made due to a AfD decision) ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 06:43, 5 March 2009 (UTC)