A fact from Sonya Legg appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 June 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that British oceanographer Sonya Legg has studied the South China Sea, where waves can be taller than 200 metres (660 ft)?
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article was created or improved during the following events hosted by the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is part of the WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the inland waters and marine environments. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on limnology- or oceanography-related topics, as well as to ensure that limnology and oceanography articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.Limnology and OceanographyWikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyTemplate:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyLimnology and Oceanography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago16 comments7 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Support: Would just like to say I am definitely not a creator of the page! I did some light CE and categorization work but all credit goes to @Jesswade88. That said, this nomination looks good to me. — Mainly12:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Comment: I think kilometers is much too big of a measurement to use here, why not use meters instead? 0.2 km is a bit of a weird measurement to compare with feet in my mind. Ornithoptera (talk) 06:19, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Ornithoptera: "Feel free to fix any errors you find ... and thank you." ... change it, if you prefer it differently, and you think its important. (I never added the conversion but someone else thought it important). thanks Victuallers (talk) 11:17, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Victuallers and SL93: You need a conversion template for countries not on the metric system, such as the United States. Not sure if I'm using the right template, but something like below. — Maile (talk) 13:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
ALT1 ... that British oceanographer Sonya Legg has studied the South China Sea where waves can be bigger than .2 kilometres (660 ft)?
Well I think thats very silly in a hook. Could we change it "six hundred feet" as I'm sure the rest of the world could cope. Surely the few people who use DYK hooks who have never heard of a kilometre (both of them?) might be intrigued to find out if the wave is made up of four or five atoms or is of a size that may collapse a nearby galaxy with its gravitational pull. Anyone who has never even heard of a mile, a cubit or a span could work out that the hook means "very big waves". Oh and guess where Sonya works? America! Victuallers (talk) 14:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Maile66 I personally think that conversion templates are not needed for hooks, but I think that a good compromise is Victualler's suggestion although as "bigger than 600 feet". SL93 (talk) 19:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Maile66 and SL93: Surprising "compromise" giving 25.4mm to close this, (Maile66 thats an inch). Lets go with that - I think the majority who dont use feet and furlongs can cope. Victuallers (talk) 09:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
ALT2 ... that British oceanographer Sonya Legg has studied the South China Sea where waves can be bigger than six hundred feet?
Conversion templates aside, the hook doesn't do a great job of conveying Legg's role in the waves. For all I know reading ALT2, it could just be that Legg is one of many scholars who happens to study this interesting sea. With that in mind: theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 08:25, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
ALT3: ... that British oceanographer Sonya Legg reports that waves in the South China Sea can be bigger than six hundred feet?