Talk:Sooryavanshi/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kpddg (talk · contribs) 13:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Review Start Hello @ D'SuperHero. I will review this article over the coming days. Please contact me for any problems. Thank You. Kpddg (talk) 13:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Observations

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Article is very well-written; no grammatical errors. I made a few minor changes and corrections. Otherwise, it is fine.

   However, one point of improvement I feel is that the last section (Critical Response), can be improved. While the content is good, it is all grouped in one big paragraph. I have tried to improve it, but more inputs are welcome.

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Article is backed by 81 accurate, reliable sources. All are working as of now.

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Covers all important aspects; infobox is informative. 'Critical Response' section includes reviews from many sources. Article is broad in its coverage.

1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Includes mixed reviews about the movie. Both positive and negative aspects. No indication of any bias. Written from a neutral point of view.

1. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Page statistics:

     Page created: 5th April, 2019
     

     Page has 2296 edits by 832 editors as of now (Kpddg (talk) 16:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC))
     

     979 249 page views in past 30 days
     

     Majority of edits are in good faith. No recent vandaism or edit wars. Article has been semi-protected as it is about a celebrated movie. This has 
     reduced cases of vandalism. 
     

1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   File:Sooryavanshi film poster.jpg = Copyright photo, complies with Wikipedia policies, fair use under United States copyright law, and image is clear and of good quality

1. Overall:

   ● Most of the article is well-written and clear. There were a few grammatical errors, sentence errors, etc. But I have fixed most of them. Please do continue to improve.

   ● I have also improved the 'Critical Response' section as much as I could. Please do improve.

   ● Sources are accurate

   ● No frequent vandalism

   According to my assessment, this article passes.

   Pass: