Talk:South Australian Mounted Rifles

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Gog the Mild in topic GA Review
Good articleSouth Australian Mounted Rifles has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 23, 2018Good article nomineeListed
September 26, 2018WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
Current status: Good article

2nd South Australian Contingent

edit

Trooper Henry Colley Hawker served in the 2nd South Australian Contingent and is listed in Murray, in George A Newbury’s South Australians and the South African War 1899-1902: being an alphabetical roll of those who took part, 1988, ISBN 0731644948 and online at http://members.pcug.org.au/~croe/ozb/oz_boer_more.cgi?record=9093 Henry Hawker was born in South Australia, served with the Royal Navy and made his own way to South Africa to serve with the South Australian Contingent. He is the father of Lanoe Hawker VC and the uncle of Arthur Bagot GC DSC. Anthony Staunton (talk) 01:02, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:South Australian Mounted Rifles/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 12:57, 23 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • I have done a light copy edit. Please check and flag up anything you are unhappy with.
  • "The South Australian Adelaide Lancer and mounted rifle militia units were merged into the South Australian Mounted Rifles in 1895." Do you mean 'were merged to become the...'?
  • "mostly composed of men who had served in the local defence force". Is there a possible link to "local defence force"?
  • "In these operations, the company helped to guard the railway line from De Aar to the Modder River." Should "In" be either 'during' or 'after'?
  • Does "with a mainly South Australian mixed volunteer group" mean what it says, or do you mean 'mainly SAMR...'?
  • "providing reconnaissance for the army of Frederick Roberts". I think that it would be normal to give Roberts' rank rather than just his name.

Really good work. A nice article. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:11, 23 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

I should assess your GANs more frequently. They are easy on the assessor. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed