GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This is a very well-presented article on a city. It covers pretty much everything that one would expect in a city article: history, geography, demographics, attractions, notable residents, etc. All of the sources look fine, and I see no issues with original research or low source quality. I don't see any fact that's unsourced, nor do I see any issue with the prose. The intro is long enough; the pictures and graphs are appropriately captioned, credited and licensed; there are no content disputes; no bias; no important information that's missing. "Notable Natives" is fine as a list, since it's a short list and changing it to prose would only make for a super-short section. Overall, I see absolutely no reason not to pass this article. Very good work all around. Reviewer: Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 03:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Too much of the County and less of the city

edit

Quite a portion of the page is better suited to be included in Salt Lake County, Utah, rather than South Jordan, Utah. Any way to move this portion off South Jordan, Utah page? Samuelsenwd (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply