Talk:South Luffenham
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Cloptonson in topic Criticism of style
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Criticism of style
edit- Six years on from the message at the head of the article, most of the content is still unsourced. I have raised a citation need for the listing of Agnes Maude Royden among the Notable People section because her own article does not mention South Luffenham. A demonstration of connection like having lived there is needed.
- Much of the details about past events are undated. There is mention of something occurring "A few years ago" - a few years ago as of what year when that was written into the article?
- Some sections have only a minority of their content fitting the section headings, for example "The War" (better expressed as the specific war dealt with), from which I have split off new sections on Tunnels and Tailbys Field, Quarries, Water Supply and School that more closely reflect the contents.
- To section I have headed School could do with an updating mention of education provision in the present day to follow on from the detail on the 19th century now ex=school building and former reading room - is there a school in the village now or do local children go to schools in another village or town?