This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I removed the following comment about the NRHP HD mentioned in the article: "Consisting primarily of a federally-administered park,[1] the district was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1982." Reference
The claim that the HD is largely a park does not appear to me to be borne out by the source. From the "definitions" link from that page, it sounds like the GNIS listing is for the NRHP HD district itself, and "park" including cultural features and administered by government is the closest choice it could get to saying it is a historic district that is listed on the National Register.
I'll withdraw my AfD request to delete this article, as it is documented now that there is a place of this name, but it seems unfair to others to have to do the documentation. The article should not have been started, in my view, and it still could perhaps better be merged into the Woodstock, Vermont article. doncram (talk) 23:25, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
