Wikipedia

Talk:Southern Rhodesian military involvement in the Malayan Emergency/GA1

< Talk:Southern Rhodesian military involvement in the Malayan Emergency
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Cliftonian in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago15 comments2 people in discussion
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk · contribs) 10:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Progression

edit
  • Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
  • Version of the article when review was closed: [2]

Technical review

edit

Criteria

edit
  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    • "...but it was beholden to Whitehall...", consider instead "...but was beholden to Whitehall..." (suggestion only)
    • "...Walls was promoted to Major...", should be "major" with no caps per WP:MILTERMS.
    • I'm unclear what you mean here: ""C" Squadron grew to number about 1,000 men..." Is this total strength at a single point in time or did the 1,000 men serve in its ranks over a period of time? 1,000 men seems quite large for a single Squadron (normally a company-sized FE).
    • Typo here "counter-insurgeny's", should be "counter-insurgency's.
    • The tense seems a little off here: "though Major C. L. "Dare" Newell comments on their attitude towards "the aborigines", which he says was colder than that of the British soldiers."
    • This seems a little awkward to me: "..who led such an RhAR platoon in Malaya...", perhaps just "...who led an RhAR platoon in Malaya..."
    • This seems archaic to me: "around the line of rail...", perhaps just "railway line"? (suggestion only)
    • "Patrols were led around the area...", perhaps "Patrols were commanded..." or just "Patrols were led..." instead? (suggestion only)
    • "The British Royal Lincolnshire Regiment, operating in the Bahau area, about 200 kilometres (120 mi) north-west of Bekok, reported to the RhAR around this time...", might work better as: "Around this time the British Royal Lincolnshire Regiment, operating in the Bahau area, about 200 kilometres (120 mi) north-west of Bekok, reported to the RhAR...", as it provide context at the start of the sentence (suggestion only).
    • Incorrect tense (I think): "which was now heading south-east towards the Palong River...", should be "which was then heading south-east towards the Palong River..."
    • Incorrect tense here too (and some minor gramatical issues): "Now approaching the end of its two-year commitment in Malaya, the RhAR continued its patrolling around Johore province without major incident until February 1958, when it returned to Rhodesia..." perhaps consider: "As it approached the end of its two-year commitment in Malaya, the RhAR continued patrolling in Johore province without major incident until February 1958, when it returned to Rhodesia."
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    • All major points cited using WP:RS.
    • Consistent citation style used throughout.
    • No issues with OR.
    • Is this accurate? "An RhAR patrol moved in single file...", the implication to me is that RhAR patrols always moved in single file. Surely formations would have been dictated by terrain, mission and enemy threat etc with a number of formations used in different circumstances? I can only comment on Australian infantry tactics but normally they will adopt single file when moving through very close terrain, such as thick jungle or when traversing linear features and defiles, but will utilise formations such as staggered file (flank protection), open file (able to produce firepower to both the front and flanks), arrow head (patrolling on a broad front in open country) and extended line (usually in the assault) as the tactical situation requires.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    • Most major points are covered without going into undue detail.
    • After reading the article I was a unclear why Rhodesia was involved in the Emergency. Although you refer to the degree of independence exercised by the Southern Rhodesian government from the British and South Rhodesia's membership of the Commonwealth I wonder if the reasons for its involvement could be covered in greater detail?
    • What casualties did the RhAR suffer during the conflict, if any? Perhaps you might be able to add something about this in the final paragraph of the article?
    • What effect did Rhodesian involvement in the Emergency effect military developments and tactics etc during it's own counter-insurgency in the 1960s and 1970s? In the lead you mention the service of men such as Peter Walls and Ron Reid-Daly in the Emergency and the fact that they held key positions in the Rhodesian Security Forces during the Rhodesian Bush War of the 1970s. Yet despite the prominence afforded in the lead, these facts are actually tucked away in a footnote. Is this possibly something that could be expanded and included in the body of the article, rather than just in a footnote, along with a discussion of their signficance?
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation):   b (all significant views):  
    • No issues here AFAIK.
  • It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
    • All recent edits look constructive.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b (Is illustrated with appropriate images):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):   d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:  
    • Images used are all in the public domain or licenced and seem appropriate for the article.
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Southern_Rhodesian_military_involvement_in_the_Malayan_Emergency/GA1&oldid=1141731643"