Talk:Soviet cruiser Maxim Gorky
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jim Sweeney in topic GA Review
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Soviet cruiser Maxim Gorky article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Soviet cruiser Maxim Gorky has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Soviet cruiser Maxim Gorky is part of the Kirov class cruisers series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rename
editShouldn't this article be named something like Maxim Gorky (cruiser)? Best regards, —surueña 11:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Not according to WP:NC-SHIPS -MBK004 05:12, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
radars
editNot used to seeing radars as plural for radar. Seems odd. Multiple radar system, or just British radar was installed? --Kevin Murray (talk) 06:46, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Soviet cruiser Maxim Gorky/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 07:50, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- y
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
edit- In the text it says - Her light anti-aircraft guns consisted of six semi-automatic 45-millimetre (1.8 in) 21-K guns. However the inf box has it as 9 × 1 - 45-millimetre (1.8 in) 21-K AA gun
- Fixed
- The inf box says she was awarded the Order of the Red Banner 22 March 1944 but there is nothing in the text to explain why
- She'd been out of combat for almost a year, so I don't think it was for anything specific. All I have is the date, no citation.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:08, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Chesneau, Roger and Whitley, M. J are listed in the references but not used
- Removed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Passed GA there may be a problem at A class or higher with the Red Banner award.--Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:17, 25 September 2010 (UTC)