This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Did a cheeky little ce, moved a few cites to sentence ends, altered a couple of wlinks, tidied biblio, rm couple of dupe wlinks. All suggestive, rv as desired. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 08:40, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Dunno, but it was annoying since I didn't want to just revert all of your edits as there was some good stuff there. Maybe just avoid messing with the conversion templates with any sort of automated program?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:14, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
If I use it on something like this again, I'll do it in isolation so if something unexpected crops a rv will be simple. I only bothered because you'd been so kind as to review Zitronella and I wanted to return the compliment. Egg on face Keith-264 (talk) 21:40, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
That's fine. Although I have to tell you that I try to review one for everyone that I submit, and I've been stacking them up this month, so...--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply