Talk:Soviet destroyer Smyshlyony (1940)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 07:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 07:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

• refugees and bombarded Axis troop positions Link Axis.

• Done

• Smyshleny struck a Soviet mine on 6 March 1942 and sank Link Soviet Union.

• Excessive, already in infobox

• I think we should link the Soviet Union in the lead too.

• Done.

• Smyshleny (Russian: Смышлёный, lit. 'Clever') Unlink Russian.

• Done

• displacing 1,727 metric tons (1,700 long tons) at standard load Link both tonnes.

• Done

• and 2,279 metric tons (2,243 long tons) at deep load Link deep load.

• Done

• designers expected would exceed the 37-knot (69 km/h; 43 mph) speed Link knots here.

• Done

• Anti-aircraft defense/AA guns is overlinked.

• Done

• Anti-aircraft defense was provided by a pair of Add "(AA)" after Anti-aircraft.

• Done

• as well as four 12.7-millimeter (0.50 in) DK or DShK machine guns round the in here.

• Done

• No commissioned part in the body?

• 'Accepted' in the body is one of several Russian equivalents to commissioned

• Infobox says 8 March while the body says 7 March?

• Done

• Odessa is overlinked.

• Done

• in response to a report of Romanian destroyers leaving the port Pipe Romanian with the Kingdom of Romania.

• Linked to a more relevant article instead

• the German invasion of the Soviet Union, on 22 June 1941 Pipe German with Nazi Germany.

• That would be overlinking, Germany is too well known.

• Not Nazi Germany. I do not think that former countries should be included in this rule. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 14:00, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

• Done.

• No OR.

Infobox

• "1,727 t (1,700 long tons)" Link both tonnes.
• "54,000 shp (40,000 kW)" Link kW.

• Both done

Images

• File:Unidentified Project 7U in the Black Sea.jpg This is strange since when had the US soldiers in the Black Sea in WWII?

• Likely taken by US naval attache

Sources

• Looks good to me they're also reliable and academic.

That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:32, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

• I think I'll pass it. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 20:10, 20 September 2019 (UTC)