Talk:Soviet destroyer Sovershenny (1940)/GA1

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 07:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 07:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • Sovershenny (Russian: Совершенный, lit. 'Absolute') Unlink Russian.
  • two bombs that virtually wrecked her; the Soviets subsequently Pipe Soviets with the Soviet Union.
  • overweight, displacing 1,727 metric tons (1,700 long tons) at standard load Link both tonnes.
  • expected would exceed the 37-knot (69 km/h; 43 mph) speed of Link knot.
  • Anti-aircraft defense was provided by a pair of Add "(AA)" after "Anti-aircraft".
  • Anti-aircraft defense/AA guns is overlinked.
  • as well as four 12.7-millimeter (0.50 in) DK or DShK machine guns Round the nought here.
  • on 25 September 1940 and was 90% complete --> "on 25 September 1940 and was 90 percent complete"
  • Why not?
  • when the Germans invaded the Soviet Union on 22 June 1941 Pipe Germans with Nazi Germany.
  • lost power and took on 1,000 tonnes (980 long tons; 1,100 short tons) of water British tonnes and remove short tons.
  • rescue detachment of the Black Sea Fleet on 28 October 1945 Link Black Sea Fleet.
  • No edit war.

Infobox

  • "1,727 t (1,700 long tons) (standard)" Link both tonnes.
  • "54,000 shp (40,000 kW) (trials)" Link kW.
  • "4 × single 12.7 mm (0.50 in) DK or DShK machine guns" Round the nought.
  • Maybe mention her formor name in the infobox and the rename and laid down dates?

Sources

  • Okay I see.

Images

  • In the sentence of File:Батарея №111 Матюхина.JPG A 130 mm gun from Sovershenny used by a battery on Malakhov Kurgan Why are there no English units?
  • I thought it was necessary to convert them again in images because the infobox and if there are tables then they are separate so why should images be included in the body? Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 21:42, 18 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 13:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

All done. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:08, 18 September 2019 (UTC)Reply