A fact from Soviet destroyer Sposobny (1970) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 January 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the Soviet destroyer Sposobny(pictured) was designed to survive a nuclear explosion?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
File:BPK61Strogiy1985.jpg is in Russian and looks out of place on the en.wiki article. I don't know if you speak Russian, but maybe you could take File:Strogiy.jpg and redo the notations in English.
The ship served during the Cold War from 1971. - This sentence is a bit short, could you add when it stopped serving in the Russian navy? This would read like "The ship served during the Cold War from 1971 to 1995"
Added end date.
They were the first class designed to survive a nuclear explosion - Were they the first class of ships in the world designed to survive a nuke? Or the first in Russia?
Clarified
Link relevant article for the fall of the Soviet Union.
Link relevant article for the fall of the Soviet Union.
Done.
I would have liked to have the Image notation done before promoting, but that is not an essential part of the criteria so Ill pass this. L293D (☎ • ✎)03:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
.jpg)
