Talk:SpaceX Dragon/GA1
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Gilderien in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Gilderien (talk · contribs) 17:23, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Please adress the concerns raised by User:Stone:
- General characteristics
- 18 attitude control thrusters insted of 18 Draco thrusters whoold be mor informative
- The SuperDraco should be separated from the General characteristics because it is a future upgrade and not a
General characteristics.
- With a production of 1 each three months there must be 4 from 2011 and 8 from 2012. Overall 12 Dragons. Is this fact?
- Demonstration flights
- launched a stripped-down version Why?
- Operational flights section is a little short amount of cargo andreturn cargo might be a good addition.
- Red Dragon and Mars One Dragon are relative long for the far future developpment they reflect.
- Red Dragon
- The 2018 launch for it is no longer possible, it was never in the last three selected missons for 2018. Was it a offical proposal?
- Radiation tolerance
- What is the difference to the shuttle or the sojus? It experienced some events which are normal in this aproach.
- Red dragon was always quoted to be different in design?
--Stone (talk) 18:17, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Also the lead should not contain material and thus does not need citations - could these been removed and the material moved/copied to the body with them?--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 18:22, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
As it has been a week with no improvements I have to fail this sorry.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 22:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)