Talk:SpaceX Super Heavy

Partial Failure / Success for IFT2

Should the IFT2 flight be regarded as a partial failure (a catagory used for other rockets) or success, since it deliver the upper stage to stage separation, which is the primary purpose of any first stage? 86.26.101.55 (talk) 18:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

No, as the booster (Boostback/landing isn't required for a successful flight, according to precedent established by Falcon 9) had a 100% successful flight.

The failure in the infobox is for IFT-1 Redacted II (talk) 17:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Technical Issue

If you look at the page statistics page, it lists a bug on the link for Chines (uses external link instead of Wikilink). However, I looked at the source code, and it uses a wikilink.

Anyone know why it's listing that as a bug? Redacted II (talk) 12:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

SubHeading 3

Adding a SubHeading 3 for every single booster decreases the quality of the article, given that some boosters have only 1-2 sentences dedicated to them. Redacted II (talk) 16:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

@97.117.109.239 warning has been sent to stop edit warring. Continuing to add Sub Heading 3 will result in a report here.

I have found 0 articles that use Sub Heading 3. There is no reason to add one for every vehicle Redacted II (talk) 01:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Commonality with SpaceX Starship (Spacecraft)

@The Page Maker 2.1, can you repeat the reformatting of the development table here in order to match SpaceX Starship (spacecraft). I'd do it myself, but I don't trust myself to make that large of a source edit. Redacted II (talk) 12:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Done The Page Maker 2.1 (talk) 02:58, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Redacted II (talk) 03:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)