Talk:Space 220 Restaurant/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Sammi Brie in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 06:47, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  


The changes are mostly copy. The Reception section has some issues that really, really need fixing—and you're just lucky enough to get someone who can catch one of them as reviewer. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 07:52, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

7-day hold to Kaleeb18. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 07:53, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review! ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 12:55, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copy changes

edit

History

edit
  • "September 20, 2021" needs a MOS:DATECOMMA.
  • Is there another source to replace the generally unreliable PopSugar?
    •   Replaced

Theme

edit
  • Rich Pope of Orlando Sentinel Can we get a "the" before the name of the newspaper?
    •   Done

Food

edit
  • Are there too many names of food items?
    •   Removed some
  • How do the Space Station Supplements figure into the menu? Their nomenclature is...confusing.

Reception

edit
  • A couple of things rub me wrong in this: Josh Elliot of Narcity stated that you will, "Eat better than an astronaut and get a great view of space without ever leaving Earth!" There shouldn't be a comma there, and the use of "you" in the article sounds off. This almost sounds...too promotional. Is there a way to reword?
  • "not and E ticket" typo fix
  • Your local writer of TV stations articles would highly suggest that any reference to NBC2.com be scuppered for two reasons:
  • The actual domain NBC2.com is hijacked or used for some spammy purpose. (It's nbc-2.com, and that's one very important hyphen!)
  • That's WBBH-TV in Fort Myers, NOT WESH. Big difference.
  • Declaring, "The effect is engaging, providing just a 'taste' of what the astronauts on the International Space Station experience every day, just with better food." I think this quote is too long. "Declaring" is not a separate sentence, so this needs to be merged with the one before it; I'd tweak it to focus on the "effect is engaging" part.
    • I changed the sentence
  • Is Finance Buzz a reliable source?
    •   Removed if not

Other items

edit
  • References are archived.
  • Earwig mostly catches proper nouns as well as the quotes used in the reception section.
  • Images: There is an appropriately tagged fair use logo and freely licensed image of the interior. Both need alt text.
    •   Done
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.