Talk:Space Battleship Yamato

Yamato Pic

I'm going to edit this article to offer a more inclusive picture of the original Japanese series, which is variously named either "Space Cruiser Yamato" or "Space Battleship Yamato". I'm going to move this article to "Space Cruiser Yamato", since that's the name I've heard more often. "Star Blazers" is only a very small and heavily-edited subset of the Space Cruiser Yamato anime. Brian Kendig 01:36, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I determined that Space Battleship Yamato is the more correct name. I'm correcting that in the articles now. Brian Kendig 14:09, 31 May 2004 (UTC)

I used the phrases "yet another evil enemy" and "melodrama abounds" to describe the fifth movie. I know that's POV, but the movie is REALLY HEAVY-HANDED, and I could use some help figuring out how to get that across without being so POV about it. (It seems, in most of the Yamato movies, like the first 1/3 of the time is spent with everyone mourning lost comrades and the last 1/3 of the time is spent endlessly watching someone die in a noble sacrifice.) Brian Kendig 14:46, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)

There is a bit of historical background and a whole lot of Nishizaki's ego involved in the English for Yamato originally being named Space Cruiser Yamato.--Outis 02:01, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Fictional spacecraft category?

I removed this article from the Fictional spacecraft category, but someone obviously disagree with me. I really don't think this article belong in that category though. There is next to nothing about fictional spacecrafts here. I suggest either writing a separate article about the ship the show is named after and put that in the appropriate category. Or at least add a section with some details about the ship somewhere in this article (like in the Red Dwarf article for example. Fictional spacecraft was littered with links to TV shows and movies that contained no more than the name of a fictional spacecraft (while the rest where usually plot details), so I removed most of them (including this one). I feel that an article should include at the very least a section detailing one or more actual fictional spacecraft before it qualifies to be listed on Fictional spacecraft. Even if it is about a movie, show or book centered around a fictional spacecraft it should contain some actual info about said spacecraft before it has any business in Fictional spacecraft. That's my humble opinion anyway. Is that just me?

--Sherool 23:14, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

• Start writing then. The ship is a nationalist Japanese icon (see rant below) and the very naming of the show after the ship was controversial enough to warrant a rename and re-dubbing before it came to America. The cat is very appropriate here. SchmuckyTheCat 04:36, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Character list

I'm gonna start work on a list of characters, with both Yamato and Star Blazers versions of their names... unless one already exists and was deleted? Should it be under "Space Battleship Yamato characters" or "Characters in Space Battleship Yamato"? Is it even worth asking? :-$ Dave-ros 17:45, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

• yay, go to work. If you're worried about deletion, start working on it in this article, then move it out when it gets large. SchmuckyTheCat 17:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

So far, so good -- I've done most of the human and Gamilon characters, and maybe tomorrow I'll start work on the Comet Empire. I could use some fact-checks as to who certain characters were named after, though -- any Japanese experts in the house? You might also like to look at my attempts to find out the kanji making up everyone's names. Don't worry, I've included the Star Blazers versions of the names too. I'd appreciate a bit of guidance with regards to neatness, how to include the Japanese and English voice actors, etc. Dave-ros 01:13, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Me again -- am gonna do a list of planets as well, since there are already calls for the Iscandar article to be merged with this one... will probably include the real planets of the Solar System as they are featured in the show (with, of course, wiki-links to the real articles)! Dave-ros 22:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Star Trek Parallells

Why was the entry about the Gamilons changing skin color removed? I seem to remember that Ganz, Bane and all the Gamilons under their command were caucasian. But all Gamilons seen after that were blue. In fact, Desslock in his early appearances, along with Krypt both had a more mauve skin tone before becoming blue. That part especially mirrors Kor, Kang, and Koloth from TOS appearing as ridge forehead Klingons inexplicably (at that time)in DS9Mr. ATOZ 19:42, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

I suggest the Star Trek Parallels section be trimmed of extraneous fanboish stuff, e.g. "having to take an inexperienced cadet crew into combat during training", "scene where the Yamato must outrun ... the explosive shockwave", and "Star Trek II featured the death of Spock and Arrivederci Yamato featured the death of everyone save one or two supporting characters". These are basic plot manoeuvres that don't suggest any deliberate or unconscious imitation.--Eyeresist 06:14, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Update--I've removed the two weakest Star Trek parallels, as mentioned above.--Eyeresist 04:57, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

I don't know the specifics, or which category this should go in, but I definitely just watched an episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation that featured a ship called the U.S.S. Yamato.

Just thought I should mention this; seems like either a trivia thing or Star Trek parallel thing... I don't know. I am not good at with the internets.

-A person

No, the makers said it was a coincidence they names the Enterprise-D's sister ship Yamato, and was nothing to do with Star Blazers! See the article USS Yamato for more... Dave-ros 10:19, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

True, but I added it anyway simply because (a) it is debatable whether this is an inadvertent reference anyway, and perhaps most importantly (b) the USS Yamato was definitely named after the WWII ship that finally became the Yamato in Star Blazers. In any case, it certainly bares mentioning if nothing else then to not have to re-visit the subject time and again. I included the Wikipedia reference to USS Yamato so that the reader can make his own determination. --Lancewes 14:37, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

The Cosmo Cleaner could not "be used to create/replenish life on dead worlds." It would remove poisoning from dead worlds. There are no parallells between the Genesis device, which was a half terraforming/half WMD device and the Cosmo Cleaner, which is a super HEPA filter. ROM 00:30, 03 March 2007 {UTC)

Sources

Some guy tagged this article for sources, yet neglected to mark or explain. Remove the tag? Evan1975 06:45, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Leave it up for a while. All articles should be sourced. It'd be nice to instead use the fact or cite templates after specific paragraphs. SchmuckyTheCat 15:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

OK, well, somebody please mark what the disputed/controversial parts are with those "source needed" tags. Evan1975 08:14, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Yahz, I agree. I wish people who want facts checked would mark which facts they want checked. SchmuckyTheCat 08:29, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Let's up that rating!

If no-one minds (famous last words!), I'd like to edit the synopses of the seasons and movies into something more descriptive (under sub-headings), especially since the movies have no pages of their own. Might also separate out all the Star Blazers attributes into a separate section -- especially since Star Blazers was created after the first two seasons were already made and broadcast in Japan. Then maybe we'll make Featured Article status, eh? (I'm damn well gonna achieve at least one in my time here!) Dave-ros 17:54, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

And I'm spent! If anyone knows more about the 3rd season, the pilot episode footage (which seems to be the stuff at the end of the badly-subtitled DVD version), or the Star Blazers version, please insert it into the appropriate part of the article. Dave-ros 10:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Think this article needs a considerable amount of streamlining -- I haven't got time as I don't have a home Internet connection at the moment (I'm writing this at work), but I think we should consolidate stuff into "Cultural impact", particularly how lots of animes have references to Yamato, while many American shows such as Star Trek similarly refer (intentionally or otherwise) to Star Blazers. Dave-ros 14:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I've put it off long enough: time for some work to be done! I really don't like all this OR comparing the show to Star Wars, Star Trek and even Crusade, but if people would object to its deletion, I can always set up Comparisons between Space Battleship Yamato and other works until someone comes up with a better idea. Or should I put it all into List of references to Space Battleship Yamato in other works, along with those numerous anime references (which I could at least summarise in Cultural impact)? Dave-ros 17:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

I've put it all under the second article title listed above (got a couple of cultural references to add myself!). If anyone can think of a better way to handle all that OR comparing the show to American series, now's the time! Dave-ros 18:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Tried to get rid of the Trivia section, since most Wikipedia articles are going this way. However, I don't really like the format someone's done for the series and movies plot summary -- we shouldn't really be putting separate links (especially ones in foreign character sets) into headings like this! However, those links could well go in the spiel, in the nihongo template, or in the infoboxes. Dave-ros 17:18, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Criticism as Star Wars ripoff?

This text was recently added to Parallels with Star Wars:

When the series was first shown on American television in 1979 many TV critics and first time viewers saw the show as a Japanese animated rip-off of STAR WARS, but many TV critics later recanted after learing the show predated STAR WARS by three years. George Lucas had not even begun writing a script his creation yet.

It doesn't belong under parallels with Star Warsbecause it is not discussing any specific similarity, where it belongs I am not sure. Secondarily, this may need an external reference, I am not sure it is a verifiable addition.

Thoughts?

Fjbfour 00:19, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

No one argued otherwise, so I took it back out. Fjbfour 23:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

This was in an article in Starlog Magazine about Starblazers when it first aired in a 1980 issue I believe.

Project A-Ko

It was parodied in the first Project A-Ko movie, with its commander being a Captain Harlock parody.

Jordanian Dub

I think I've seen this version once, I've mostly seen the second arabic version but you're right, it isn't really good effort by the dubbing team. Godaiger

Fair use rationale for Image:SpaceBattleshipYamato.jpg

Image:SpaceBattleshipYamato.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Rationale added to image article. Johnmc (talk) 09:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Star Blazers

"Star Blazers" had a large impact in being one of the first translated Japanese anime series in the U.S. (after Kimba the White Lion, Astro Boy, Speed Racer, and Battle of the Planets/Gatchaman). Most importantly, it was the first that had an over-arching plot and storyline that required the episodes to be shown in order. It paved the way for further popular translations such as Robotech much more than the previous translated anime. (As much as Robotech may be maligned, the means of its development were a necessary evil at the time in order to make it acceptable for broadcast in the U.S. then.) The number of references to Star Blazers in the Space Battleship Yamato articles actually reinforces its significance as an important stand-alone entity, rather than a simply a mere dub or direct translation. Lun Esex (talk) 21:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

I think it should be separate as the article will be bloated Dwanyewest (talk) 03:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

See "Star Blazers deserves its own article" and "Space Battleship Yamato bloated". The split was done in order to clean up and reduce this article. Other editors (save for one) agreed this was the way to go. --Nohansen (talk) 04:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Intro and outro music

Does anybody have a listing of the intro and outro music and would like to add it to the article? I can start: Isao Sasaki sings the opening song Uchuu Senkan Yamato. 219.117.195.84 (talk) 12:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Pachinko and slot machines.

There have been several Space Battleship Yamato themed Pachinko and slot machines, the newest featuring video screens displaying animated CGI videos and clips from the TV series and movies. Here's what Yamasa has, if you can read Japanese. http://www1.yamasa.co.jp/ymt/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizzybody (talk • contribs) 01:21, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Space Battleship Yamato (spaceship)

The AfDs argued about the viability of a number of sources, but none were really ever shown to have anything significant on the ship itself. Without anything like that, there is no need for an paragraph upon paragraph of minute in-universe details. Summarizing it in a setting section would be best, and any information relevant would likely fit well within the article anyway. TTN (talk) 22:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Oppose - I don't see the point of denying the existence of an article for a vital in-universe object. The content already in the article would be a waste of removal. If the Enterprise has its own article, so should this. ServiceGhost (talk) 00:42, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

That's never a good argument. The Enterprise article is just as bad, and it should also be merged if sources cannot be found for it. I have no idea if they exist or not, but it has nothing to do with this. Wikia is better for such in-depth information, and cleaning this article per WP:NOTPLOT would likely reduce it to a third of its size anyway. TTN (talk) 00:46, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Send to AfD - This is one of those cases where it appears the article is supported by only one source, where is the notability? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:55, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

The two AfDs ended up with too much attention on the series rather than the actual ship, so it is likely that the same will happen with a new one. I'd say "no consensus" with a suggestion to start a merge discussion would be the best possible outcome from one. TTN (talk) 19:10, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

• Support. Unless the ship itself is demonstrably notable, discussing it in this article is sufficient coverage. Goodraise 03:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
• Procedural Support: As things currently are, there probably aren't enough sources for this article to exist on its own. Whilst I do think that this in-universe ship is just as "significant" as, say, the Enterprise or the world of the Avatar film, it's really hard to justify a separate article given the lack of available references. Information regarding the ship can be merged into the franchise article. --benlisquare_T•C•E 06:08, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
• Merge or delete unless reliable refs are added. I can see this being notable, but so far no sources support this conclusion. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
• The reference is the movies, surely?? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:44, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

The legacy part have a mistake...

I did not edit it because I am not sure what the source says, but "Hado-ho" or as you put it, "Hadouho" is not the missile system, but the Wave Motion Gun, as Hadouken is Wave Motion fist...Feel free to edit it if it isn't a part of the source. 198.53.255.5 (talk) 00:04, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Sequels

Anyone notice we have 2 sequels section? Merging them. Also I don't think season 3 gets mentioned, adding. Ranze (talk) 02:59, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

References?

A few years back, Voyager Entertainment changed the focus of the starblazers.com web site, wiping all previous content. Tim Eldred, former webmaster of starblazers.com, moved all content to the fan page ourstarblazers.com, which means most of the references on this Wiki page are now dead links. Is there any way to change those references, or at least put up a warning that any links to starblazers.com no longer work? Prince Zordar (talk) 01:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

I recommend using the Wayback Machine to recover articles from starblazers.com. Dwanyewest (talk) 09:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Distribution Rights For North America

Does anyone have any current information regarding distribution rights for any/all incarnations of SBY in North America? The wiki article for Star Blazers currently lists Voyager Entertainment's website as the official one, however, their site suspended all sales in August of 2014 without explanation. Before the suspension, they were selling the Star Blazers versions of the first three seasons, subtitled versions of the SBY movies and subtitled versions of the first two volumes of SBY 2199 on DVD and Bluray. Volume three was supposed to be released on August 28th, the same day Voyager Entertainment suspended all online sales.Wyldstaar (talk) 04:45, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Space Battleship Yamato. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.starblazers.com/html.php?page_id=549
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.starblazers.com/html.php?page_id=236
• Corrected formatting/usage for //home.comcast.net/~hasshin/shimamoto.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.starblazers.com/html.php?page_id=136
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.starblazers.com/html.php?page_id=303
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.starblazers.com/html.php?page_id=80
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.starblazers.com/html.php?page_id=455
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.starblazers.com/images/jun09/images/Starlogpages.PDF
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.starblazers.com/html.php?page_id=173
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.starblazers.com/html.php?page_id=363
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.starblazers.com/html.php?page_id=432

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Space Battleship Yamato. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://starblazers.com/html.php?page_id=252
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://starblazers.com/html.php?page_id=302
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.starblazers.com/html.php?page_id=171
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.starblazers.com/html.php?page_id=263

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC)